Jump to content

zak99b5

Members
  • Posts

    464
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    44

Posts posted by zak99b5

  1. 6 hours ago, Jay said:

    Happy New Year and Happy wishes to all of you and whatever you have going on with this fine hobby. I have an issue with my previous order from Tudor. I spent almost $350 on it and have already placed future orders. The issue with my first order is that I ordered 6 custom painted teams. They came out nice. I went with the option of getting the fab five figures. The website shows that you’ll receive the figures that have the painted platforms and painted skin tones. However, I received teams that were painted with the plain all white figures, the ones for $8. The figures with skin tones go for $10. This doesn’t set well with me. The platforms on the top are painted green and the bottom is white. As a collector of these figures for over 40 years I definitely know the difference between all of the figures. Tudor Games has been completely unresponsive to my inquiry up to this point. Anyone else experiencing something similar?

    You ordered and paid for fab 5 custom painted teams and got ones that just had skin tones and platforms painted?

    I do not know who paints the underside of the platforms. Just top and sides, as thin as they are. 
     

    Not sure what the issue is?

    • Like 1
  2. 9 hours ago, nefgm.org said:

    I personally would buy more decals. In my experience, I have found that the Yellow Tudor Stick-On Numbers don't show up well on dark colored jerseys. They are too translucent. Unless maybe it is some of the really older Tudor numbers from the 70's. If they were bought recently, I am fairly certain you will not be satisfied with the results. Even the white numbers from Tudor that were produced in recent years, tend not to show up too well on darker jerseys. 

    Totally. The yellow #s stink. 
     

    • Like 1
  3. For Christmas son #2 bought me a Mean 13 set. Painting them as I type. Finished the skin tones and the platforms. 
     

    I am going to make them the Wolverines. Hope the helmets do justice to the originals. 

    No sock or sleeve stripes on the uniform makes them a little easier.  And I already have yellow uni numbers from Bnutt.

    I use Testors paint. Flows and covers well, dries fast. I like the gloss look, just like original Tudor figs. 

    IMG_0847.jpeg

    • Like 5
  4. I'm intrigued by the magnetic field covers.

    I have two non-metal fields, and old fiberboard 600 (620-size) and a newer HPPS (620-size as well) field.  Might be a good way to convert them to being able to use magnetic accessories?

    • Like 2
  5. My league is refining using dice to determine pass completion.

    First, with a D6, we had a roll of 1-5 be complete if receiver was in backfield, 1-4 from LOS to 15 yards out, 1-3 from 16-30 yards, and 1-2 over 30.  A roll of 6 would be an interception IF there were an unengaged defender within a passing placement stick of the intended receiver.  

    This worked to speed up the game, but was far from ideal, with a QB 18 yards behind the LOS throwing to a receiver across the field and 15 yards past the LOS and a defender right next to him being pretty easy to complete.

    So we've decided to use the measuring passing stick to determine the roll.  If it's a red pass 1-4, white pass 1-3, blue pass 1-2 (same INT rules).

    This made it a bit better and what we are finishing the season with.

    However, we want to refine this a bit.  I have two D10s, one for the tens digit and one for the ones.  But we need to decide on the percentages at the three distances.

    We found that over the modern NFL history, 57% of passes were complete (I'm sure it's a little higher now).

    First thought was to use same %s as before (0-66 roll complete on red pass, 0-50 white, 0-33 blue).  Then we thought maybe make it 0-70 red, 0-55 white, 0-40 blue.

    What seems more realistic?  Are there better percentages for us to use?

    Additionally, we are adding pressure: defender close enough to QB knocks the number to roll down 5 points, and a close defender to receiver would also reduce it another 5, with a possible 10 subtracted if both are under duress.  

    It would only seem fair if the receiver is wide open that the roll target increases by say 5, like if there's no defender further downfield than he is on his side of the field (using the hashmarks somehow?)

    Congrats if you read all this.  I'm looking forward to the input of my fellow EFers.

    • Like 3
  6. Could you post the measurements of the Tudor passing sticks?

    The "normal" Buzz Ball passing sticks are based on the yards of an old 620 field and are likely different, as the Tudor ones are based on base lengths.

    Normal measuring stick is 40 yards long (half red, half white)

    Red placement stick is 6 yards

    White placement stick is 12 yards

    Blue placement stick is 18 yards

    The pressure placement sticks appear in the photos above to add 3 yards to each placement stick.  Pressure measuring stick seems to be about 8 yards.

  7. I needed to make a momentary switched extension cord to use the GBN motor.

    I found a push-button momentary switch at home cheapo.  Also bought two extension cords.

    On one of the cords, I fit the switch between the blades of the plugs and utilized the holes in them for the terminal screws on the switch.  Taped it all up well. Clipped the other end of that cord off.

    On the other cord I cut one of the wires (hot side, but it doesn't reall matter) near the female plug end.  Stripped back the insulation on the cut wires there and at the end of the cord with the switch.  I used heat-shrink butt connectors and crimped the switch cord into the other, so now it's a dogleg.

    I made a second one, and all our board's switches are always turned to ON and we use the momentary switch to control the action.  Works great.

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Please review our Terms of Use.